readthefuckingmanual.net

[SOLVED] rlm_exec: Wait=yes but no output defined. Did you mean output=none?

Error added: 2006-06-01T13:52:12Z

1 people waiting for the answer...

1 answers found.

Answer 889 (0.0% helpful)

On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:33:00AM -0800, Rick Kunkel wrote:
> Heya all,

> I\'m getting this warning when running.  The longer version, in debuggin 
> mode, is this:

> Module: Loaded exec 
>  exec: wait = yes
>  exec: program = \"(null)\"
>  exec: input_pairs = \"request\"
>  exec: output_pairs = \"(null)\"
>  exec: packet_type = \"(null)\"
> rlm_exec: Wait=yes but no output defined. Did you mean output=none?

> This doesn\'t seem to be a section I\'m using.  Should I just comment it 
> out?  Or maybe put \"output = none\" after \"input_pairs = request\"?  It 
> seems a harmless error, but I figured I\'d clean it up anyhow.

That\'s a known bug (and harmless, as you say) in 1.0.2. The error
message _should_ say \"output_pairs=none\" but if you put that, it
will refuse to start because output_pairs is defined and wait=no
are incompatible.

FreeRADIUS 1.1\'s default for output_pairs is \"none\", so for wait=no
you can leave it blank. (A null-program\'d exec is a different case)

Or at least I think it is... Gotta check that.
Permalink

Add an answer/solution

If you know the answer, please add your own solution below.
If you don't know, but find out later, please come back and share your answer - there will be other people struggling with this too.


Please enter 61948 here

If you want to be notified via email when this is solved, enter your email address here: